Research archive
Download articles, the full report, and replication materials including CSV files and scripts used in the project’s corpus work.
Article 1
The grammatical-possibility article. A focused philological study arguing that a subject-initial reading with the consonantal sequence בראשית, here designated Bereshit, construed as a nominal or onomastic subject in Genesis 1:1 is grammatically admissible, though distributionally under-attested.
Article 2
The historical-plausibility article. A layered study of how Genesis 1:1 was progressively stabilized in transmission, vocalization, commentary, and translation.
Article 3
Explores whether Bereshit, if read as subject, may be understood as the revealed designation of God’s originating creative agency.
Change article1.pdf and article2.pdf and article3.pdf to your actual final PDF filenames if they differ.
Article 4
Explores a Christian Word/Logos trajectory from the Bereshit-subject reading of Genesis 1:1. It argues that while berēʾšît does not lexically mean “word,” Bereshit may be theologically construed as the mode of God’s creative speech: the named form of divine self-expression by which creation comes to be.
Change article4.pdf to your actual final PDF filename if it differs.
Expanded project documentation including the Core argument, appendices, tables, replication notes, and supporting research discussion.
Working CSV for the extended object-chain and coordination sweep used in Appendix B and Appendix F.
Second-pass review table with tighter apposition detection and revised screening notes.
Genesis book data export used for candidate harvesting and comparison against the visible Hebrew.
Supporting VBScript used to aggregate and label clause- and verse-level candidate results.
Review set of screened near-miss verses relevant to Appendix B’s object-chain question.
Plain-language entry point to the project’s question, claim, and evidence.
The main philological argument in web form, with links into the appendices and report.
These files are provided as part of the project’s research archive. The three main articles and companion study are the clearest public presentation of the argument. The report, appendices, CSV files, and scripts are supporting materials intended to document method, transparency, and replicability.